Casas

Casas v. HomeGoods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20243:22-cv-01274California254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAHI CASAS, individually and on Case No.: 3:22-cv-01274-RBM-SBC behalf of all similarly situated employees,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO SUBMIT v. MATTER TO ARBITRATION AND

DISMISS CLASS CLAIMS

HOMEGOODS, INC., and DOES 1 15 through 20, inclusive, [Doc. 8] 16 Defendants.

On April 4, 2024, Plaintiff Sarahi Casas and Defendant HomeGoods, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”) filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss (“Joint Motion”). (Doc. 13.) In the Joint Motion, the Parties “move to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).” (Id. at 2.) “Rule 41(a)(1) allows a plaintiff to ‘dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.’” Dougan v. Centerplate, Inc., No. 22-CV-1496 JLS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.