Cullen

Cullen v. Ryvyl Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20243:23-cv-00185California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK CULLEN, Individually and on Case No. 3:23-cv-0185-GPC-SBC behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING

v. DEFENDANT J. DREW BYELICK

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

RYVYL INC. F/K/A GREENBOX POS, BEN ERREZ, FREDI NISAN, J DREW

BYELICK, BENJAMIN CHUNG, EF

HUTTON F/K/A KINGSWOOD

CAPITAL MARKETS, A DIVISION OF

BENCHMARK INVESTMENTS, INC.,

19 and R.F. LAFFERTY & CO., 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Before the Court is Defendant J. Drew Byelick’s Request for Order Dismissing All Claims Against Byelick With Prejudice. ECF No. 74. Plaintiffs responded with a Request for Voluntary Dismissal of Byelick as a Defendant Without Prejudice, ECF No. 75. “Under Ninth Circuit precedent, when a plaintiff fails to amend his complaint after the district judge dismisses the complaint with leave to amend, the dismissal is typically considered a dismissal for failing to comply with a court order” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.