Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 INTEGRITY MEDICAL PRODUCT Case No. 22-cv-00785-BAS-BLM
SOLUTIONS, LLC,
14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v.
MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
16 SEROCLINIX CORPORATION, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 28) 17 Defendants.
18 19 Now before the Court is Defendants Seroclinix Canada and Seroclinix Delaware’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) Plaintiff Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (ECF No. 26.) Defendants move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC because it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 29), to which Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 30). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. 28 I. Background Plaintiff alleges that Defendants, under separate corporation…