Madera
Madera v. Comenity Capital Bank
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20243:23-cv-02124California715 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLINA MADERA, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02124-RBM-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v. (1) JOINT MOTION TO STAY COMENITY CAPITAL BANK and
ACTION AND ARBITRATE
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
CLAIMS AS TO COMENITY
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
CAPITAL BANK
16 Defendants. (2) STIPULATION TO SUBMIT
CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC. TO
ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
CASE AS TO EXPERIAN
[Docs. 19, 20]
24 On February 20, 2024, Plaintiff Carolina Madera (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Comenity Capital Bank (“Comenity”) filed a Joint Motion to Stay Action and Arbitrate Claims as to Comenity Only (“Joint Motion”). (Doc. 19.) In the Joint Motion, Plaintiff and Comenity stipulated to stay this action and submit Plaintiff’s claims against Comenity to binding individual arbitration. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff and Comenity contend that “the…