Madera

Madera v. Comenity Capital Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20243:23-cv-02124California715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLINA MADERA, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02124-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. (1) JOINT MOTION TO STAY COMENITY CAPITAL BANK and

ACTION AND ARBITRATE

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

CLAIMS AS TO COMENITY

SOLUTIONS, INC.,

CAPITAL BANK

16 Defendants. (2) STIPULATION TO SUBMIT

CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC. TO

ARBITRATION AND TO STAY

CASE AS TO EXPERIAN

[Docs. 19, 20]

24 On February 20, 2024, Plaintiff Carolina Madera (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Comenity Capital Bank (“Comenity”) filed a Joint Motion to Stay Action and Arbitrate Claims as to Comenity Only (“Joint Motion”). (Doc. 19.) In the Joint Motion, Plaintiff and Comenity stipulated to stay this action and submit Plaintiff’s claims against Comenity to binding individual arbitration. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff and Comenity contend that “the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.