AEA Investment Properties, LLC v. Barcenas Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20243:23-cv-02088California1,477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AEA INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02088-RBM-BLM

LLC,

ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, (1) REMANDING CASE TO STATE 14 v. COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION;

ILDIFONSO BARCENAS TORRES,

PABLO HERNANDEZ, and DOES I–V, (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA Defendants. PAUPERIS AS MOOT;

[Docs. 2, 3, 4] 20 21 On November 11, 2023, Defendant Pablo Hernandez (“Defendant Hernandez”), proceeding pro se, filed a Notice of Removal of Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2023-00019556-CL-UD-CTL (“Notice of Removal”). (Doc. 1.) On the same day, Defendant Hernandez filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Motion”). (Doc. 2.) In his Notice of Removal, Defendant Hernandez states, “Plaintiff has actually filed a [f]ederal [q]uestion action in [s]tate [c]ourt, for which the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.