Wadeea

□

2 3 4 5 6 □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} MASHID WADEEA Case No.: 3:23-CV-1690-JO-DDL Plaintity ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO 13 || V. AMEND IN PART AND || MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, UTES □□□ ete sh Defendant. 16 17 18 i For the reasons stated on the record during oral argument, the Court denies Plaintiff |;motion for leave to amend in part. Because Plaintiff has stipulated that her Unfai Competition Law (“UCL”) claim is based on the same facts and legal theories as he 22 || warranty claims, and because she seeks the same monetary remedies for both, the Cou ||finds that it lacks equitable jurisdiction over her UCL claim. See Sonner v. Premie 24 || Nutrition Corp., 971 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 2020). The Court thus denies leave to amend wit regard to her proposed UCL claim. The matter is continued to Wednesday, May 8, 2024, at…