Blinken
Infracost Inc v. Blinken
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INFRACOST INC.; and HASSAN Case No.: 23-CV-2226 JLS (MSB)
KHAJEH HOSSEINI,
ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
Plaintiffs, EX PARTE REQUEST FOR LEAVE v. TO FILE NOTICE OF
SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS
(ECF Nos. 4, 8) Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 4) filed by Defendant Antony Blinken. Plaintiffs Infracost Inc. and Hassan Khajeh Hosseini (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 5), and Defendant filed a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 6). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument on March 7, 2024. See ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs then filed an Ex Parte Request for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority (“Req.,” ECF No. 8), which Defendant opposed…