Blinken

Infracost Inc v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20243:23-cv-02226California6,988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INFRACOST INC.; and HASSAN Case No.: 23-CV-2226 JLS (MSB)

KHAJEH HOSSEINI,

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, EX PARTE REQUEST FOR LEAVE v. TO FILE NOTICE OF

SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF Nos. 4, 8) Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 4) filed by Defendant Antony Blinken. Plaintiffs Infracost Inc. and Hassan Khajeh Hosseini (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 5), and Defendant filed a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 6). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument on March 7, 2024. See ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs then filed an Ex Parte Request for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority (“Req.,” ECF No. 8), which Defendant opposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.