Moore

Moore v. Duran

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20243:23-cv-00194California4,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MERRICK MOORE, Case No.: 23-cv-194-GPC-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND J.J. DURAN, et al., DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

Defendants.

COMPEL;

(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE A SUBPOENA; and 18 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

21 [Dkt. Nos. 47, 52, and 55] 22 Before the Court are a motion to amend the pretrial schedule [Dkt. No. 47], a motion to compel further discovery responses from Defendants [Dkt. No. 52]; and a motion for leave to issue a subpoena to Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) and/or the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) [Dkt. No. 55] by pro se Plaintiff Merrick Moore (collectively, the “Motions”). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.