Segura

Segura v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20243:22-cv-01029California4,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR SEGURA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01029-RBM-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. 29] 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant City of San Diego’s (“Defendant”) motion for judgment on the pleadings under FRCP 12(c) (“MJP”). (Doc. 29.) On October 3, 2023, Defendant filed a statement of Plaintiff’s non-opposition in support of Defendant’s MJP. (Doc. 31.) On October 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant’s MJP. (Doc. 32.) On October 24, 2023, Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. 33.) In the MJP, Defendant argues Plaintiff fails to identify any policy or allege sufficient facts for any custom in his first amended complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. 29- at 4–6.) Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s real complaint is not a concern with the City of San Diego’s policies but with a violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.