Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20243:21-cv-02137California1,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC, Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING MOTION

v. HEARING ON MAY 8, 2024

EXOCEL BIO INC., et al., [Dkt. Nos. 233, 235] Defendants. 16 On May 8, 2024, the Court heard oral argument on multiple discovery-related motions. Having considered the parties’ briefing and the arguments of counsel, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to compel deposition testimony [Dkt. No. 233] and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motions for leave to serve third party subpoenas and to compel production of financial information [Dkt. No. 235] as set forth below: Plaintiff’s Motions (Dkt. No. 235) Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoenas For the reasons stated on the record at the May 8 hearing, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to for leave to serve additional third party subpoenas. Plaintiff’s counsel clarified at the motion hearing that Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.