Turner

Turner v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20243:24-cv-00649California1,308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BRYAN TURNER, JR. Case No.: 3:24-cv-00649-RBM-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [DOC. 2] AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, M.T.S., 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

CHASE BANK, CITY OF SAN DIEGO,

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, JANE DOE

1, JANE DOE 2, and CHASE BANK Defendants. 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, David Bryan Turner, Jr. (“Plaintiff” or “Turner”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint under the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”), along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Docs. 1, 2.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s IFP motion and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). /// /// II. IFP MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.