Guidry

Guidry v. Vitas Health Care Corporation of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20243:24-cv-00176California5,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAISHAUNA GUIDRY, M.D., Case No.: 3:24-cv-00176-H-MMP H.M.D.C., an individual,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO COMPEL v. ARBITRATION

VITAS HEALTHCARE

[Doc. No. 6.] CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 25, 17 Defendants. 18 On December 21, 2023, Plaintiff Kaishauna Guidry, M.D., H.M.D.C. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. (Doc. No. 1-2.) On January 25, 2024, Defendant VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California (“Defendant”) removed the case to this Court. (Doc. No. 1.) That same day, Defendant filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) On February 29, 2024, Defendant filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. (Doc. No. 6.) On March 25, 2024, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.