Rose

Rose v. Selene Finance, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20243:23-cv-01691California4,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY ROSE, Case No.: 3:23-cv-1691 W (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT SELENE’S REQUEST

FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE [DOC. 4];

SELENE FINANCE, LP, et al. (2) GRANTING IN PART AND Defendants. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

SELENE’S MOTION TO DISMISS

16 [DOC. 3]; AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT TRUSTEE CORPS

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND [DOC. 7]

19 Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Selene Finance, LP and Trustee Corps. Defendant Selene also filed a request for judicial notice and Trustee Corps filed a joinder of Selene’s motion. Plaintiff Henry Rose opposes the motions to dismiss, but not the joinder or request for judicial notice. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the request for judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.