Thane Charman v. Desert Lake Group,LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20243:23-cv-00959California2,571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THANE CHARMAN, Case No. 23-cv-0959-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF Nos. 16, 18) DESERT LAKE GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16

Pending before the Court are Defendant Ryan Hoggan and Defendant Chris Tirrell Armstrong’s motions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff Thane Charman’s action. (ECF Nos. 16, 18.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss. The Court further GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend his Amended Complaint. 23 I. Background Plaintiff, a resident of San Diego, California, brings this action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, which restricts phone solicitations and the use of automated telephone equipment. Plaintiff alleges he registered his phone number on the National…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.