Ballester

Ballester v. Boucek

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20243:23-cv-01839California10,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELEANOR BALLESTER, Case Nos.: 3:23-cv-1730-RBM-VET; 3:23-cv-01839-RBM-VET Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DISMISSING CASES

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

LEAH BOUCEK, et al,

Defendants. [Case No. 3:23-cv-1730-RBM-VET 16 Docs. 3, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 26, 34, 36, 17 41, 42, 43, 45, 48, 49, 50, 51, 54] 18 [Case No. 3:23-cv-1839-RBM-VET 19 Docs. 3, 4, 14, 17, 22, 23, 24, 27–28] 20 21 On September 19, 2023, Plaintiff Eleanor Ballester, proceeding pro se,1 filed a Complaint in Case No. 3:23-cv-01730-RBM-VET (hereinafter, “1730 Complaint”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of her rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. 25 26 27 1 The Court notes that while Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, she is not proceeding in forma 28 (1730 Case-Doc. 1. ) This action names twelve Defendants that each allegedly have some association with Plaintiff’s state court family law case, San Diego County Superior Court Case 21FL009971C (hereinafter, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.