ONeill

ONeill v. Amazon.Com Services LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20243:24-cv-00045California254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} ENRIQUE O'NEILL, Case No.: 24cv45-JM-SBC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT

MOTION TO DISMISS

14 || AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, (Doc. No. 11) Defendant. 16 17 18 Presently before the court is the Parties’ “Joint Stipulation and Motion to Dismiss.” ||(Doc. No. 11). The Joint Motion is signed by all Parties who have appeared in this |/action. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order 22 || by: (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed either an answer a motion for summary judgment; or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). The Parties’ Jomt Motion satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and is, therefore, effective on filing. 26 || Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.