Almada

Almada v. Krieger Law Firm, A.P.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20243:19-cv-02109California3,020 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JEFFREY A. ALMADA, on behalf of Case No.: 19-cv-2109-MMP himself an all others similarly situated 10 class members, ORDER: 11 Plaintiff, 1. GRANTING IN PART AND 12 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED

KRIGER LAW FIRM, A.P.C.,

MOTION FOR SECOND

14 Defendant. DISTRIBUTION FROM RESIDUAL COMMON FUND

AND FINAL APPROVAL OF

CY PRES BENEFICIARIES;

AND

18 2. VACATING HEARING 19 [ECF No. 85]

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Almada’s Unopposed Motion for a Second Distribution from the Residual Common Fund and Final Approval of Cy Pres Beneficiaries. [ECF No. 85.] Defendant did not file an opposition.1 For the reasons stated 24 25 1 Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c) provides “Waiver: If an opposing party fails to file the papers 26 in the manner required by Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2, that failure may constitute a consent to 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.