Reed
Reed v. Buckel
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20243:24-cv-00179California4,599 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL REED, Case No.: 24-cv-0179-MMA (AHG)
CDCR #AE-9821
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. No. 7]
vs. (2) DENYING IFP MOTIONS Doc. Nos. 4, 9 AS MOOT;
A. BUCKEL, S. STEADMAN, T.
(3) DENYING REQUESTS FOR
MARTINEZ, B. COLON, B. CATES,
JUDICIAL NOTICE [Doc. No. 6] CHRISTIAN PHIFFER, R. NICKLES, H. AND EXTENSION OF TIME [Doc.
ARREOLA, K. TAMEZ, H. MOSELEY,
No. 8] AS MOOT Defendants. 20 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER FRCP 8(a) AND 28 U.S.C. 22 §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1) 23 INTRODUCTION On January 25, 2024, Mychal Reed (“Plaintiff” or “Reed”), an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. On January 29, 2024, the Court denied Reed’s request to…