Reed

Reed v. Buckel

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20243:24-cv-00179California4,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL REED, Case No.: 24-cv-0179-MMA (AHG)

CDCR #AE-9821

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. No. 7]

vs. (2) DENYING IFP MOTIONS Doc. Nos. 4, 9 AS MOOT;

A. BUCKEL, S. STEADMAN, T.

(3) DENYING REQUESTS FOR

MARTINEZ, B. COLON, B. CATES,

JUDICIAL NOTICE [Doc. No. 6] CHRISTIAN PHIFFER, R. NICKLES, H. AND EXTENSION OF TIME [Doc.

ARREOLA, K. TAMEZ, H. MOSELEY,

No. 8] AS MOOT Defendants. 20 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER FRCP 8(a) AND 28 U.S.C. 22 §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1) 23 INTRODUCTION On January 25, 2024, Mychal Reed (“Plaintiff” or “Reed”), an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. On January 29, 2024, the Court denied Reed’s request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.