Maserang
Maserang v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Zscaquline M., Case No.: 19-cv-2010-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Acting 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. [DKT. NO. 26]
17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 26. Neither Plaintiff nor the Commissioner oppose the Motion. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Zscaquline M. filed this action seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income. Dkt. No. 1. The Court reversed the denial of benefits and remanded the case for further proceedings. Dkt. No. 23. Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion, the Court awarded Plaintiff $4,500 in attorney fees under the Equal…