Alexandre

Alexandre v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20243:22-cv-01459California5,254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIANO ALEXANDRE, et al., on Case No. 22-cv-1459-MMA (VET) behalf of themselves, all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

v. [Doc. No. 27] AMAZON.COM, INC., and DOES 1–10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On September 22, 2023, Plaintiffs1 Luciano Alexandre, Christine Louise Johnson, and Eric Nelson (“Plaintiffs”), “all acting as sole proprietorship businesses,” filed a second amended class action complaint, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against Defendant Amazon.com (“Defendant” or “Amazon”) and Does 1–10. See Doc. No. 21 (“SAC”) at 2. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the SAC in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), or in

27 1 Plaintiffs state that former Plaintiff Nam Be “has decided to not become an Amazon delivery service 28 the alternative, 12(b)(6).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.