Masimo Corporation v. Sotera Wireless

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20243:19-cv-01100California780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MASIMO CORPORATION, a California Case No. 19-cv-1100-BAS-MSB corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR v.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND

14 SOTERA WIRELESS, INC., a California JOINT STIPULATION FOR corporation, HON HAI PRECISION DISMISSAL (ECF No. 139) INDUSTRY CO., LTD., a Taiwan 16 corporation, Defendant. 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for stipulated permanent injunction (“Stipulated Permanent Injunction”). (ECF No. 139.) Additionally, the parties jointly stipulate to dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice upon entry of the permanent injunction (“Stipulated Dismissal”). (Id.) I. Joint Stipulation for Permanent Injunction Finding the stipulated permanent injunction appropriate, the Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion for stipulated permanent injunction. (Id.) The Court having considered the Second Amended Complaint, the parties’ Stipulated Permanent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.