Anti Police-Terror Project v. City of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20233:20-cv-03866California2,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASHWIN RUPAN,

Case No. 20-cv-03866-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 205 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION This case was initiated in June 2020 by seven plaintiffs who sought a temporary restraining order, injunctive relief and damages on behalf of a class of demonstrators who attended protests in Oakland beginning on May 29, 2020. The complaint named as defendants the City of Oakland, former Interim Chief of Police Susan E. Manheimer, OPD sergeant Patrick Gonzales, OPD officer Maxwell D’Orso, and OPD officer Casey Fought. On July 29, 2020, the Court entered a preliminary injunction. Dkt. no. 52. On October 20, 2020, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and numerous individuals – including Ashwin Rupan – were added as plaintiffs. Ultimately, the injunctive relief and damages claims of all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.