Stronghold Engineering v. City of Monterey CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2024D082763California7,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/21/24 Stronghold Engineering v. City of Monterey CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, D082763

INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CVRI2103427) v.

CITY OF MONTEREY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Chad W. Firetag, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino and Andrew Van Ornum, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley; Michael G. Colantuono, Megan A. Wharton and Merete E. Rietveld; Christine Davi, City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Stronghold Engineering Incorporated (Stronghold) successfully bid to renovate the City of Monterey’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.