Phillip Sanders v. Margaret Mims

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 202423-16088California471 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP EUGENE SANDERS, No. 23-16088

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00634-JLT-SAB

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MARGARET MIMS, Fresno County Sheriff; VANG, Correctional Officer at Fresno County Jail,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 17, 2024**

Before: CANBY, PAEZ, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Phillip Eugene Sanders appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law claims arising from the

medical treatment he received while in pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.