Chase Lentz v. David Bernhardt
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 21 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHASE MATTHEW LENTZ, No. 23-15404
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00071-DAD-DB
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 29, 2024**
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Chase Matthew Lentz appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his employment action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Desire, LLC v. Manna
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Textiles, Inc., 986 F.3d…