Chase Lentz v. David Bernhardt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 202423-15404California610 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHASE MATTHEW LENTZ, No. 23-15404

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00071-DAD-DB

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Chase Matthew Lentz appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his employment action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Desire, LLC v. Manna

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Textiles, Inc., 986 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.