Amie Drammeh v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
105 F.4th 1138
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202422-36038California2,818 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMIE DRAMMEH; YUSUPHA No. 22-36038 CEESAY, Individually and as surviving parents of Cherno Ceesay; D.C. No. MARAM CEESAY, Personal 2:21-cv-00202- Representative of the estate of Cherno BJR Ceesay,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER v. CERTIFYING

QUESTION TO

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a THE SUPREME Delaware corporation; RASIER, LLC; COURT OF DOES, 1-100, inclusive, WASHINGTON

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 26, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed June 24, 2024

Before: Richard A. Paez, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. SUMMARY*

Certification Order / Washington Law

The panel certified the following questions to the Washington Supreme Court: 1. Under Washington law, does a rideshare company have a special relationship with its drivers giving rise to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.