Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202422-55930California641 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 24 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORI MYERS, an individual, on behalf of No. 22-55930 herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:20-cv-00335-JWH-SHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation,

Defendant,

and

MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY

US, LLC, A Delaware Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 12, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff-Appellant Lori Myers sued Defendant-Appellee Mars Wrigley

Confectionary US, LLC (“Mars”) under the California Consumers Legal Remedies

Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law. Myers claimed the label of Mars’s

Dove Dark Chocolate products misled her to believe the products were made

without employing child…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.