N.W.

N.W. v. Lee CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2024A168670California2,800 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 6/24/24 N.W. v. Lee CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

N.W.,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A168670

v. BRANDON LEE, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CCH-23-585623) Defendant and Appellant.

Brandon Lee appeals from the trial court’s issuance of a Code of Civil Procedure1 section 527.6 civil harassment restraining order upon the petition of N.W.2 Lee argues the restraining order was issued in error because there was no substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that Lee was the person who sent harassing text messages to N.W. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In April 2023, N.W. petitioned for a civil harassment restraining order against Lee. The trial court issued a temporary restraining order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.