Abrishamcar

Filed 6/24/24 Abrishamcar v. Oracle America CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

MARYAM ABRISHAMCAR et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A167116

v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV535490) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Oracle America, Inc. (Oracle) appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of a claim brought by plaintiffs Maryam Abrishamcar and Kavi Kapur (collectively, plaintiffs) under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.; PAGA). In moving to compel arbitration nearly seven years into the case, Oracle argued previously-controlling law had precluded it from enforcing plaintiffs’ arbitration agreements until the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in…