William Forrest v. Keith Spizzirri

Good Law
104 F.4th 1201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 202422-16051California330 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM F. FORREST, a single No. 22-16051 man; WENDY SMITH, a single woman; MICHELLE MARTINEZ, a D.C. No. single woman; JODI MILLER, a 2:21-cv-01688- married woman; KENNETH GMS TURNER, a married man, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER

KEITH SPIZZIRRI; MIRIAM

SPIZZIRRI, husband and wife; KEN MARING; MARING, Unknown; a married couple, named as Jane Doe Maring; CYNTHIA MOORE; MOORE, Unknown; a married couple, named as John Doe Moore; UNKNOWN PARTY, husband named as Pat Doe and wife, named as Jane Doe I; JOHN DE LA CRUZ; DE LA CRUZ, Unknown; a married couple, named as Jane Doe De La Cruz;

INTELLIQUICK DELIVERY, INC.,

an Arizona corporation; MAJIK LEASING LLC, an Arizona corporation; MAJIK ENTERPRISES I, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed June 25, 2024

Before: Susan P. Graber, Mark J. Bennett, and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY*

Arbitration

Following the Supreme Court’s opinion in Forrest v. Spizzirri, 144 S. Ct. 1173 (2024),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.