United States v. Andrew Kowalczyk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 202419-30216California604 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30216

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-cr-00095-MO-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 5, 2024 Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Kowalczyk (Kowalczyk) appeals his conviction for nine counts of

sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a), 2251(e), and

2253. Kowalczyk challenges the district court’s denial of his motions to suppress

evidence discovered during the searches of his luggage and his storage unit. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. “We review de novo motions to suppress, and any factual findings made at

the suppression…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.