Fatima Buzani Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 202420-72701California854 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FATIMA BUZANI MARTINEZ, No. 20-72701

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-587-408

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submission Deferred October 18, 2022 Submitted June 25, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BYBEE, OWENS, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Fatima Buzani Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal from

the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of cancellation of removal and voluntary

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). departure. Where the BIA cites Matter of Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872 (BIA

1994), “and also provides its own review of the evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.