Daniel Martin v. Clark County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 202422-16881California1,973 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL MARTIN, No. 22-16881

Plaintiff-Counter- D.C. No. Defendant-Appellant, 2:19-cv-01623-APG-DJA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CLARK COUNTY,

Defendant-Counter-Claimant- Appellee,

JOHN MARTIN; MARCUS McANALLY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2023 San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge COLLINS.

Plaintiff-Appellant Daniel Martin (Plaintiff), a Black man, sued Clark County,

the Department of Juvenile Justice Services director John Martin, and supervisor

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Marcus McAnally (collectively, Defendants) for race discrimination and retaliation

after Plaintiff was fired from his position as a County juvenile…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.