People v. Lane CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2024D083331California969 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 6/25/24 P. v. Lane CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D083331

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCN423383)

TALAL HANSEAN LANE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Daniel F. Link and James E. Simmons Jr., Judges. Affirmed. Richard Schwartzberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel Rogers and Vincent P. LaPietra, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Talal Hansean Lane guilty of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.