P.

P. v. Gilbert CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2013B241622California824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/1/13 P. v. Gilbert CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B241622

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA387578) v.

WHYTINNIE LEE GILBERT et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT:*

Defendants Whytinnie Lee Gilbert (Gilbert) and Armand Jamall Johnson (Johnson) appeal following their convictions for second degree robbery in violation of Penal Code Section 211.1 The trial court denied Gilbert’s motion to sever his trial from Johnson’s. The trial court sentenced Gilbert to the midterm of three years for the robbery and one consecutive year under section 667.5, subdivision (b) for having suffered a prior prison term, which he admitted. Gilbert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.