P.

P. v. Fuller CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2013B244731California1,915 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/1/13 P. v. Fuller CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B244731

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. TA122594, TA120194) v.

PATRICK FULLER et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT:*

Defendants Patrick Fuller (Fuller) and Christopher Session (Session) appeal following their pleas of “no contest” pursuant to a plea bargain. Fuller pleaded “no contest” to one count of attempting to dissuade a witness in violation of Penal Code section 136.1, subdivision (a)(2).1 He admitted that the offense was committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang pursuant to section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(B).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.