P.

P. v. Robinson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2013C071476California4,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/1/13 P. v. Robinson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

THE PEOPLE, C071476

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F009A)

v.

RACHAEL-ANNE PEARL ROBINSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Rachael-Anne Pearl Robinson pled no contest to assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence, placed her on three years‟ probation, and ordered her to pay various fees. On appeal, she contends that the trial court improperly ordered her to pay certain fees because: (1) “the court failed to state a statutory basis for all the fees”; (2) there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the amount of some of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.