Heather Resco v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 202423-35177California1,035 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HEATHER RESCO, No. 23-35177

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-05064-TOR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 7, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Heather Resco (Resco) appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial

of her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security

income under the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. “We review the district court’s order affirming the [Administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.