P.

P. v. Melger CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 2013C073019California809 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/2/13 P. v. Melger CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C073019

v. (Super. Ct. No. CRF122589)

THOMAS JOSEPH MELGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Thomas Joseph Melger asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Based on our review of the record, we will modify the judgment to award defendant 85 days of presentence custody credit and 42 days of presentence conduct credit. Finding no other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment as modified.

1 I…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.