Knowledge and Intelligence Program v. Lukin CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 2013B234495California5,150 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/2/13 Knowledge and Intelligence Program et al. v. Lukin CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

KNOWLEDGE AND INTELLIGENCE B234495

PROGRAM PROFESSIONALS, INC.,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. NC053503 )

v.

ANTHONY LUKIN et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Joseph E. DiLoreto, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Kathleen Kenealy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Steven M. Gevercer, Assistant Attorney General, Joel A. Davis and Elizabeth S. Angres, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Plager Schack and Michael L. Schack for Plaintiff and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.