United States v. Angelo Stackhouse

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 202422-30177California562 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30177

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:21-cr-00035-SPW-1 v.

ANGELO COREY STACKHOUSE, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 4, 2023 Portland, Oregon

Before: BERZON, NGUYEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Angelo Corey Stackhouse appeals his conviction for kidnapping an Indian

person within the boundaries of a reservation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1152,

1201(a)(1)–(2), 1201(g), and 3559(f)(2).1 He contends that the district court erred

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 We address in a contemporaneously filed opinion Stackhouse’s issues concerning convictions for kidnapping a minor using a means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201(a)(1), 1201(g),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.