Taniform

Taniform v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2024A169162California1,513 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guez, J.

Filed 6/27/24 Taniform v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PROTUS NKWANA TANIFORM

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A169162

v. COMMISSION ON TEACHER (Alameda County CREDENTIALING, Super. Ct. No. 23CV034864) Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Protus Nkwana Taniform appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court denied his third petition for writ of mandate to compel the Commission on Teacher Credentialing (Commission) to reinstate his teaching credential. We affirm. Taniform held a single-subject teaching credential and taught in three Bay Area school districts. On August 30, 2016, one of the school districts learned he let…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.