People v. Veloz CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2024G062593California905 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sanchez, J.

FACTS

In March 2022, defendant filed a petition for resentencing and averred: “1. A complaint, information, or indictment was filed against me that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder, murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine or other theory under which malice is imputed to a person based solely on that person’s participation in a crime, or attempted murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine. [Citation.] [¶] 2. I was convicted of murder, attempted murder, or manslaughter following a trial or I accepted a plea offer in lieu of a trial at which I could have been convicted of murder or attempted murder. [Citation.] [¶] 3. I could not presently be convicted of murder or attempted murder because of changes made to [sections] 188 and 189, effective January 1, 2019.” The court appointed counsel for defendant, received additional briefing from the prosecution, and summarily denied defendant’s petition for resentencing. In a statement of decision, the court held defendant was ineligible for relief on count 1 because section 1172.6 does not apply to convictions for conspiracy to commit murder.

3 The court also held the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.