Reed

People v. Reed

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2024A168358California4,418 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 6/27/

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A168358, A168368

v. (San Francisco City & County JOSEPH PATRICK REED, Super. Ct. Nos. CT22000854,

CRI2527813)

Defendant and Appellant.

Joseph Patrick Reed challenges the trial court’s orders revoking his three-year term of parole and remanding him to the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Reed raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by finding he violated the conditions of his parole; and (2) whether it erred by remanding him to CDCR custody pursuant to Penal Code section 3000.08, subdivision (h), a mandatory remand provision applicable to, as relevant here, parolees subject to a lifetime period of parole under section 3000.1.1 We conclude there was no abuse of discretion in finding Reed violated his parole. However, we find the trial court erred in remanding Reed to CDCR custody

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.