Tomas Perez v. Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202423-15043California1,125 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TOMAS PEREZ, No. 23-15043
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00067-RCJ-CSD v.
BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES, INC., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert C. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 14, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: LEE and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM,** District Judge.
Plaintiff Tomas Perez brought this action against his former employer, Barrick
Goldstrike Mines, Inc., for wrongful interference with his rights under the Family
and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and retaliatory discharge in violation of Nevada
public policy. The jury returned a verdict for Barrick on both claims, finding that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting…