CBRE

Filed 6/28/24 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CBRE et al., D083130

Petitioners,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2021- 00033025-CU-PO-CTL)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN

DIEGO COUNTY,

Respondent; ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

JAKE JOHNSON,

Real Party in Interest. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the dissent to the opinion filed on June 4, 2024, be modified as follows: The last sentence of the first full paragraph on page 2 (beginning with “CBRE acknowledged”) is deleted and replaced with the following: Crew “always” told CBRE that “[t]he liability’s on you” for the consequences of CBRE’s decision not to obtain permits, meaning “if an inspector comes into the building and sees that we’re doing work without a permit, it will have to be stopped, and [the owner will] have to pay” to get the necessary approvals. CBRE never disputed these assertions by Crew, showing that CBRE and PRI understood the ramifications of the…