Williams v. Love CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2024A168790California780 words

Opinion

Opinion

Burns, J.

Filed 6/28/24 Williams v. Love CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for pur- poses of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

SHAWNY K. WILLIAMS, as Trustee, etc.,

A168790

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (City and County of San Francisco SHANDA LOVE et al., Super. Ct. No. CUD-23-671215) Defendants and Appellants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

In this unlawful detainer action, the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment—filed by Shawny K. Williams, as Trustee of the Williams Calderon Trust—and agreed that Shanda Love, Shannon Williams, and Mashama Nolan (collectively, appellants) could not show the existence of a triable issue of material fact after admitting (in discovery responses) the allegations of the Trustee’s complaint. Accordingly, the trial court entered judgment—for possession of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.