Colbert

Colbert v. Callejas CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2024C098344California4,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Filed 6/28/24 Colbert v. Callejas CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

ZURI K. COLBERT et al., C098344

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2021-00301184) v.

MICHELLE CALLEJAS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiffs Zuri K. Colbert and Nafisah Timmons sued defendants County of Sacramento (County) and County employees Michelle Callejas, Lisa Wullenwaber, and Zackary Kollross for fraud and negligence based on child protective services records linking plaintiffs with individuals who had a history of committing serious abuse. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and denied leave to amend, finding defendants immune from liability for making…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.