United States v. Vladimir Hernandez
105 F.4th 1234
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202422-50134California7,036 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50134
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00715- v. VAP-
VLADIMIR STEVEN HERNANDEZ,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 5, 2023 Pasadena, California
Filed June 28, 2024
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Kenneth K. Lee, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Lee; Dissent by Judge Bumatay SUMMARY *
Criminal Law
The panel vacated the district court’s order denying Vladimir Hernandez’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and remanded, in a case in which the panel addressed whether a criminal defendant’s belated realization that his safety-valve proffer could lead to reprisal in prison counts as a “fair and just” reason to withdraw his guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d)(2). The panel held that a defendant must first offer in good faith a “new” basis for seeking to withdraw his…