Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 202419-72634California1,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AROLDO RODRIGUEZ DIAZ, Nos. 19-72634 21-70497 Petitioner, Agency No. A205-023-162 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 27, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, TALLMAN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz, a Salvadoran national, petitions for review of two

orders from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The first order affirms an

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 Against Torture (CAT) and rejects Rodriguez Diaz’s argument that the government’s

violation of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.